Ever since AMD launched Zen, all CPUs primarily based on the structure have proven that they’re particularly delicate to reminiscence pace, in addition to different timings. Utilizing quicker RAM may give a large enhance in gaming efficiency, particularly in instances the place the sport may be very CPU-demanding.

So it is time to see how the Ryzen 9 7950X3D fares when utilizing a wide range of reminiscence kits, with totally different bandwidths and latencies.

Zen and its DRAM Sensitivity

Once we carried out one of these check with the Ryzen 5 5900X, within the video games that tasked the CPU probably the most, going from customary DDR4-3200 CL14 to manually tweaked DDR4-4000 CL16, the common body price elevated by as a lot as 16%.

It is no totally different with the present Zen 4 structure, with the Ryzen 7 7700X being extraordinarily delicate to reminiscence bandwidth and latency, seeing on common 17% greater gaming performance utilizing DDR5-6000 CL30 versus DDR5-5200 CL40. This is a matter for AMD, as Intel’s Raptor Lake structure is not practically as delicate to reminiscence speeds and timings.

One of the best answer to this was found when AMD launched the Ryzen 7 5800X3D, the primary mannequin to make use of a further 64 MB of L3 cache, stacked on prime of the usual 32 MB, giving an unlimited whole of 96 MB.

In testing, we discovered that going from DDR4-3200 to DDR4-3800 (a 19% enhance in pace) solely improved efficiency by 2%, on common. We did discover that in additional demanding video games, the margin could possibly be as excessive as 5%, however that is nonetheless not a lot of a distinction.

The explanation for the 5800X3D displaying such a small enchancment was fully all the way down to the bigger L3 cache. The additional capability reduces how typically the CPU has to drag knowledge out of the comparatively gradual system reminiscence, which is why quicker RAM did not make a giant distinction.

After all, this is not a everlasting repair for Zen’s DRAM subject as video games proceed to turn out to be increasingly more demanding, nevertheless it does imply the 3D V-Cache mannequin will all the time have a big benefit, although it’ll nonetheless proceed to learn from quicker reminiscence.

And all of this must be true for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D, because it too has 64 MB of additional L3 cache. Its attainable reminiscence efficiency could also be much less related for the time being when in comparison with the 7950X, however with out query, you may nonetheless need the very best reminiscence attainable.

So let’s examine how reminiscence scaling differs between Zen 4 and Zen 4 3D V-Cache in right this moment’s video games. For the entire testing, we used a GeForce GTX 4090 at 1080p, Home windows 11, and Resizable BAR was enabled. The Ryzen processors have been paired with the Gigabyte X670E Aorus Master and the Core i9-13900K with the MSI MPG Z790 Carbon WiFi.

Gaming Benchmarks

First up we’ve Watch Canine Legion and right here the 7950X3D noticed a ten% enhance in efficiency from the bottom spec DDR5-5200 CL40 reminiscence to our DDR5-6000 CL30 check reminiscence. That is nonetheless fairly a big efficiency uplift, particularly given the 13900K noticed only a 2% enhance, although curiously efficiency fell away rather more sharply when pairing the Intel CPU with DDR5-4800.

Nevertheless, when in comparison with the 7700X, the 3D V-Cache enabled 7950X did scale by a much smaller margin, because the 7700X noticed a 19% efficiency enchancment when upgrading from 5200 to low-latency 6000 reminiscence. So it is a clear signal that the bigger L3 cache helps to reduce Zen 4’s reliance on reminiscence efficiency.

We have recognized that Horizon Zero Daybreak is not a really reminiscence delicate title for some time and these outcomes simply affirm that, with Intel’s i9-13900K scaling by simply 4%. The 7700X noticed only a 7% enhance when upgrading from DDR5-5200 to 6000, by far one of many smallest efficiency uplifts we noticed for that CPU.

That margin was halved with the 7950X3D, to simply 3%, once more offering extra clear proof that the 3D V-Cache half is way much less reliant on system reminiscence and far nearer to the scaling habits of the Raptor Lake CPU.

As we have seen throughout a number of opinions, Shadow of the Tomb Raider is a really CPU-demanding title that noticed efficiency slashed on the 7700X when utilizing slower reminiscence. The DDR5-6000 CL30 outcomes have been 18% quicker than 5200 CL40, for instance, and that is a big efficiency distinction for RAM to make.

The identical reminiscence noticed the Core i9 efficiency enhance by a mere 3%, a tiny efficiency distinction that was considerably replicated by the 3D V-Cache enabled 7950X3D, which noticed only a 5% enchancment when shifting from 5200 to 6000 reminiscence.

Additionally, for these of you questioning if scaling is by some means totally different between single and twin CCD Zen 4 processors, the reply is not any. Right here you may see that the body price and reminiscence scaling efficiency is nearly equivalent between the 7950X and 7700X.

We truly ran the 7950X by means of plenty of video games, however the general image was no totally different, therefore why we solely included the outcomes from probably the most reminiscence delicate recreation in our benchmark lineup.

We witnessed a really related efficiency development in The Riftbreaker as properly — right here the 19300K was only one % quicker when utilizing the 6000 reminiscence whereas the 7700X gained an enormous 17% within the common body price.

Nevertheless, the 7950X3D noticed a mere 2% uplift, clearly displaying how little the 3D V-cache half depends on reminiscence efficiency, in comparison with the usual Zen 4 mannequin.

A Plague Story: Requiem is a recreation that significantly hundreds up the CPU, and that is one more instance the place the 7700X actually struggled with excessive latency, low bandwidth reminiscence, seeing an virtually 20% uplift when shifting from 5200 to 6000.

The i9-13900K improved by simply 3%, whereas the 7950X3D gained a 6% uplift — twice that of the Core i9, however roughly 3 times lower than the 7700X.

Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered is one other extremely CPU-demanding recreation, and on this instance, the Ryzen 7 7700X picked up an enormous 21% efficiency enchancment when shifting from DDR5-5200 to 6000 reminiscence. The 13900K, alternatively, noticed only a 4% uplift, once more proving that Zen 4 is considerably extra reminiscence delicate.

The brand new 7950X3D skilled a scant 2% enhance, making it much less reminiscence delicate than even the 13900K on this instance. Although identical to the Intel processor, efficiency did drop off with DDR5-4800, one thing we did not see as a lot of with the 7700X, the place its efficiency appeared to backside out a lot sooner.

Final up we’ve The Callisto Protocol and right here the 13900K gained 5% in common body price when upgrading from 5200 to 6000 reminiscence, whereas the 7700X noticed a way more substantial 14% enchancment.

In the meantime, the 7950X3D decreased that margin to simply 7%, half that of the 7700X and remarkably much like the 13900K.

7 Recreation Common

Now when evaluating the general efficiency throughout the 7 video games examined, on common the Core i9-13900K noticed only a 3% efficiency enchancment when shifting from DDR5-5200 to DDR5-6000 reminiscence, whereas the Ryzen 7 7700X gained a much more substantial 17%.

The rise for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D, although, was solely 4% when going from 5200 to 6000 reminiscence, so a really related margin to that of the 13900K, and once more highlights simply how a lot much less reliant on RAM clocks and timings these 3D V-Cache elements are when in comparison with the usual fashions.

It is price noting that AMD’s Zen 4 processors do not sometimes work with reminiscence units a lot quicker than DDR5-6000. That reminiscence is ok for the entire present era of CPUs, offering the motherboard’s BIOS is so as, although some will do 6200 and the perfect silicon will probably be steady at 6400, however that is the max pace.

We solely wish to benchmark situations that each one silicon can help, which is why we max out at DDR5-7200 for Raptor Lake and DDR5-6000 for Zen 4.

What Does This All Inform Us?

Simply as we discovered with the Ryzen 7 5800X3D, Zen 4 3D V-Cache CPUs are far much less reminiscence delicate when in comparison with the usual fashions. The excellent news is you may run into fewer memory-related efficiency points with the 7950X3D when in comparison with the 7950X or another Zen 4 half with out 3D V-Cache.

The dangerous information, should you can name it that, is that none of this actually issues as we do not suggest you pair an costly AM5 processor with something apart from DDR5-6000 CL30 reminiscence, because it ensures the very best efficiency for Zen 4 now, and sooner or later.

Not solely that, however premium DDR5 reminiscence is now very inexpensive — cheaper than an X670 motherboard and less expensive than a CPU just like the 7950X3D, so why hassle saving a couple of dollars on reminiscence?

For instance, the most cost effective DDR5-5200 32GB set, a Team T-Force Vulcan CL40 equipment, prices round $120. For a further $10, although, you should buy G.Skill’s Flare X5 DDR5-6000 CL36 equipment and simply one other $5 can get you G.Talent’s Ripjaws S5 DDR5-6000 CL32 equipment.

The premium G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo DDR5-6000 CL30 reminiscence we use for testing presently prices $155, $60 greater than base spec DDR5-5200 reminiscence, nevertheless it’s whole a no brainer.

Do your self a favor and get the great things, no matter whether or not or not you purchase a 3D V-Cache half.

Purchasing Shortcuts:


Source link