The day has lastly arrived once we can see official, non-AMD benchmarks of its new Zen 4 flagship CPU. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D goes on sale on Feb. 28 and is the corporate’s first 32-thread V-Cache CPU. That’s thrilling information for hardcore players with a giant funds ready to improve. Nonetheless, it’s not a clear sweep over its rivals from Intel or competing chips from AMD, for that matter. Its $699 price ticket can be powerful to swallow, given its area of interest place available in the market, because it’s not the quickest chip in productiveness. It may well high the charts for gaming, however it will depend on the sport. This places it in a precarious place that may have AMD followers ready for the inexpensive 7800X3D to reach in April.

As a fast recap, AMD is launching three Zen 4 V-Cache CPUs. The 16-core, 32-thread Ryzen 9 7950X3D is reviewed right here and prices $699. There’s additionally a 12-core, 24-thread Ryzen 9 7900X3D that prices $599. It seems like AMD didn’t ship that out to reviewers. Lastly, the eight-core, 16-thread Ryzen 7 7800X3D prices $449. That’s popping out in April, and it looks as if it’ll provide a tempting combo of price-to-performance–in any other case, AMD wouldn’t be holding it again for thus lengthy. Nonetheless, these chips differ within the quantity of overcall cache they provide: 144MB, 140MB, and 104MB, respectively. All three CPUs are 120W TDP CPUs too, which is a tad decrease than their non-X counterparts. AMD needed to drop the clocks a bit to compensate for the additional warmth generated by the extra cache. In addition they have a decrease most temperature of 89C in contrast with 95C for the earlier CPUs.

Productiveness Checks

 

Our colleagues at PCMag ran the numbers on this spicy little bit of silicon. AMD beforehand marketed the Ryzen 7 5800X3D as purely a gaming CPU. The extra cache can provide a major enhance in sure sorts of video games, so it wasn’t simply advertising and marketing. With the Zen 4 variations of the Ryzen 9 chips, it’s taking a special strategy by having two chiplets. One chiplet has the V-Cache on it, and the opposite doesn’t. Theoretically, this enables a best-of-both-worlds state of affairs. Apps that don’t profit from the additional cache, like productiveness apps, can run on the usual chiplet at excessive clocks. Video games can run on the V-Cache die. Nonetheless, as these checks present, the decreased clocks and working temperature of this CPU sluggish it down in customary CPU benchmarks. The non-V-Cache 7950X beats it in each check besides one, exhibiting the additional cache isn’t useful for these productiveness checks.

Gaming Checks

 

Right here’s the place the rubber meets the highway, and within the video games utilized by PCMag, it’s not a decisive victory. The 7950X3D is on the high of the benchmark charts, however at $699, it wants extra important margins than it’s exhibiting. The Core i9-13900k prices round $580, and the Ryzen 9 7950X can be round that value. Regardless of costing greater than $100 extra, it both loses to each of those CPUs or may be very shut, making it a troublesome promote. Total there’s no knockout victory available right here, as we noticed with the Ryzen 7 5800X3D, which was the undisputed gaming champ.

Energy and Thermals

 

 

That is one space the place AMD’s latest CPU shines. It reveals the advantages of the additional cache in that it may possibly go toe-to-toe with Intel in benchmarks whereas utilizing a lot much less energy. When operating Adobe Premier and Cinebench, we see whole system energy at a surprising 130W lower than the Core i9-13900K. It’s utilizing 160W lower than the flagship and notoriously power-hungry i9-13900KS too. For thermals, it’s sitting toasty at 90C regardless of being billed as an 89C max temp CPU. That’s scorching however 10C lower than its rivals from Intel. Total AMD’s choice to decrease TDP appears to have paid off.

Conclusion

The one portion of PCMag’s checks we didn’t analyze is a giant win for AMD and its iGPU efficiency. For somebody shopping for a $699 CPU, that won’t matter, so we’re leaving it out. Total, although, this isn’t the triumph folks anticipated when AMD introduced these CPUs. It didn’t mop the ground with Intel’s CPUs or non-V-Cache variations both. The shortage of numbers for the 12- and eight-core variations may also give folks pause. AMD definitely has a quick and environment friendly CPU on its fingers, although. The worth ensures that solely probably the most hardcore will spring for it, particularly given the worth of AM5 motherboards and DDR5 reminiscence.

Now Learn:


Source link