from the trademark-through-the-ages dept
5 Years In the past
This week in 2018, whereas Theresa Might was repeating her calls for that tech companies control more speech on social media, we hosted a sequence of posts about content material moderation surrounding an occasion at Santa Clara College, with essays by Eric Goldman, Mike Godwin, Kate Klonick, and extra. A UK appeals court docket stated the GCHQ’s mass collection of internet communications was illegal, US senators have been demanding an investigation into the intelligence neighborhood’s refusal to implement whistleblower protections, and ICE lastly bought its long-sought-after nationwide license plate database. Apple and Verizon have been persevering with to lobby against right to repair laws, California’s internet neutrality legislation took another step forward, and the FCC “Broadband Advisory Panel” faced accusations of (surprise, surprise) cronyism. In the meantime, the NFL was taking part in its ordinary sport of abusing trademark law around the Super Bowl.
Ten Years In the past
By no means to be outdone by the NFL, this week in 2013 the Worldwide Olympic Committee was getting an early begin on trademarking everything including the number “2014”. We appeared on the authorized scenario for unlocking telephones following the removal of the DMCA exemption, a copyright spat over the present Glee exposed some of the ridiculousness of copyright law, and (in what now appears mundane, however was stunning information on the time) Netflix released all 13 episodes of a TV show… at the same time! In the meantime, the Prenda saga continued (and continued, and continued).
Fifteen Years In the past
Don’t rely the NFL out of the trademark stupidity struggle, although! This week in 2008, the New England Patriots applied for a trademark on “19-0” to represent an undefeated season, whereas the league was again to ishutting down Tremendous Bowl events for having screens which might be too large. The RIAA was failing to clarify why copyright damages should be higher, whereas one decide was very unimpressed with their lawsuit bundling strategy. Swedish prosecutors, after much anticipation, lastly filed charges against The Pirate Bay, whereas Swiss officers turned their consideration to the illegal tactics of an anti-piracy company. And a UK court docket adopted the US’s footsteps by deciding to allow software patents.
Source link
