For an extended whereas, I’ve had my eye on an improve for my gaming PC, particularly within the GPU division – I will be sincere, I am obsessive about attaining that good highly effective system to offer constant excessive body charges.
Whereas utilizing an RTX 3080 Ti (which, make no mistake, continues to be an absolute powerhouse), on the 3440×1440 decision on Dell’s Alienware AW3423DWF, I discovered that it could not fairly push its method by way of extremely demanding AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (particularly with ray tracing enabled).
Happily, the beautiful people at Nvidia and Asus reached out to offer not solely the ROG Swift PG49WCD OLED tremendous ultrawide monitor ($1,199 / £1,399 / round AU$2,699) but additionally the TUF RTX 4080 Tremendous OC Version GPU for testing – for those who got here right here for a fast reply on this particular GPU improve path, I can inform you certainly, it is value it.
The RTX 4080 Tremendous storms by way of the 3440×1440 decision on most settings, and does the identical with the PG49WCD’s 5120×1440 decision (particularly with DLSS 3). This comes after checks in a number of video games, most notably – you guessed it – the unbelievable Resident Evil 4 remake.
Whereas Capcom’s 2023 return hit wasn’t essentially a demanding title, I’ve all the time needed to crank graphics settings to the max with out worrying in regards to the heavy efficiency hit I would see with the 3080 Ti – and the RTX 4080 Tremendous has allowed me to do exactly that.
What makes the soar from the RTX 3080 Ti to the 4080 Tremendous worthwhile?
It is fully attainable to stay with Nvidia’s high-end RTX 3000 sequence GPU at 3440×1440, 5120×1440, and even 4K, however the issue you may run into is the necessity to alter your in-game graphics settings. That is particularly the case since so many latest PC titles are poorly optimized (I will by no means shut up about this), and the extremely helpful DLSS 3 is simply obtainable to RTX 4000 sequence customers – with Staff Inexperienced’s Body Era software program, even for those who’re confronted with poor efficiency, it may work wonders by actually making extra frames for increased body charges (regardless of the marginally elevated latency this causes).
The body price would wildly fluctuate between round 60 and 100 frames per second within the Resident Evil 4 remake on the 3440×1440 decision with the 3080 Ti when utilizing the ‘Excessive (6GB)’ texture high quality setting with ray tracing enabled. It did not assist that there is truly no DLSS assist for the sport, and enabling FSR 2 on an RTX 4000 sequence GPU simply does not really feel proper – particularly given how significantly better DLSS is on the subject of preserving picture high quality.
Testing with the RTX 4080 Tremendous
While these efficiency outcomes aren’t unhealthy, you possibly can end up coping with fixed body price dips (additionally relying in your CPU), which could be extremely irritating. I additionally should point out that the body price within the Resident Evil 4 remake particularly can fly all over as you enter new places – most of my testing was performed through the iconic village onslaught close to the start of the sport, which is the place a lot of the dips occurred (probably because of the quite a few enemies, destructible objects, and corpses).
In got here the RTX 4080 Tremendous to my support! Even with out entry to DLSS, it outperformed the RTX 3080 Ti comfortably, maintaining a constant body price above 99fps at 5120×1440 utilizing the identical ‘Excessive (6GB)’ texture high quality and ray tracing enabled. I did not handle to check the RTX 3080 Ti on the 5120×1440 ultrawide decision, however the outcomes at 3440×1440 ought to provide you with a robust indication of the way it could wrestle with the PG49WCD monitor’s 5120×1440 panel.
In addition to the remake, I gave the 4080 Tremendous a run for its cash, testing Cyberpunk 2077 at most settings utilizing DLSS 3 in ‘High quality’ mode, and this simply sat above 100fps – setting the ‘Overdrive’ ray tracing mode on (a daft setting that even the RTX 4090 struggles with) dropped this all the way down to about 30 to 55fps. When in comparison with the 3080 Ti’s 20 to 30fps, the distinction is evident to see when each GPUs are put beneath heavy load in some of the demanding video games obtainable.
Downsides of the RTX 4080 Tremendous
If there’s one gripe I’ve with the RTX 4080 Tremendous itself (and the opposite high-end RTX 4000 playing cards, too), it is the ability cable adapter that comes with the GPU. Intent on closing your PC’s facet panel? When you’re utilizing the included adapter, overlook about it. Not with out squashing the ability cable to a ridiculous diploma – contemplating earlier tales of RTX 4090s burning because of problems with energy connectors not absolutely inserted, I used to be by no means going to threat flexing a stiff cable adapter simply to safe my case’s facet panel, in the end placing my system in danger.
Buying a Seasonic 12VHPWR power cable served as a greater answer (if after all, you’ve got a suitable Seasonic PSU), offering a much more handy case setup for me.
In addition to this, the RTX 4080 Tremendous impressed me by taking video games that might chug alongside on my earlier setup and in lots of instances actually brute-forcing its method by way of to incredible efficiency whereas nonetheless permitting them to look their finest.
How did the Asus PG49WCD OLED fare?
As most OLEDs do, the Asus ROG Swift PG49WCD tremendous ultrawide does an unbelievable job at offering nice deep black ranges because of the infinite distinction ratio – this paired with a 32:9 side ratio on the 5120×1440 show decision, is the stuff of goals.
My infatuation with the Resident Evil 4 remake won’t ever die, and whereas this monitor’s decision pushes the attitude far too near Leon, a mod often called REFramework from ‘Praydog’ on GitHub fixes this, adjusting the FOV appropriately.
Like I’ve stated in earlier articles, a 32:9 show is incredible for making a extra immersive expertise, and thankfully the PG49WCD (like many different OLED displays) does an honest job at it. Much like the transfer from the RTX 3080 Ti to the RTX 4080 Tremendous, the soar from the Alienware QD-OLED ultrawide to Asus’ 49-inch display was effectively value my time.
It single-handedly pushed my immersion up a notch (the place I initially hadn’t anticipated it to) – whereas one of the best OLED show I’ve personally used continues to be the one on the Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x laptop computer with its True Black HDR 600 VESA certification, this did not take something away from my expertise with the PG49WCD regardless of it solely being True Black 400.
The one side that did go away me with minor annoyances because it does with most OLED displays, is the OLED care pixel refresh – whereas this is not essentially a difficulty because it’s there to forestall potential burn-in, it turns into irritating utilizing this instrument after some time. What does not assist right here both, is the small LED indicator beneath the monitor, which does not get vibrant sufficient to inform you whether or not a pixel refresh is happening (earlier than realizing refreshes occur routinely, thankfully).
That is fairly totally different with the AW3423DWF QD-OLED, as there’s a vibrant inexperienced LED mild on the ability button to point a refresh is going on – however on a optimistic observe for the PG49WCD, a minimum of the reminder does not seem proper in the midst of your display, disrupting gameplay.
Again to the case of immersion, I just lately bought the Meta Quest 3S VR headset, and I can say that this widened perspective comes shut sufficient (with the bonus of an OLED panel). There are small instances of a fisheye impact in some video games (particularly Name of Obligation: Black Ops 6 for me), however it is not very noticeable.
Is the 32:9 side ratio an excessive amount of for gaming?
Now, contemplating the pricing of Asus’ PG49WCD monitor ($1,199 / £1,399 / round AU$2,699), it is undoubtedly not an inexpensive choice for many PC avid gamers – it is value noting that a lot of video games shouldn’t have official assist for the 32:9 side ratio, so I’ve already needed to take care of counting on modders to discover a answer the place attainable. There’s additionally certainly a facet of getting an excessive amount of display house, notably for gaming.
This is not me criticizing the monitor, however relatively letting that it’s not an absolute must-buy over a 3440×1440 show – it is actually value it do not get me incorrect, however for those who’re not seeking to drain your pockets for the monitor and Nvidia’s high-end GPU to energy by way of it, you are higher off aiming for the likes of the aforementioned AW3423DWF QD-OLED.
You may additionally like…
Source link
