{"id":9363,"date":"2022-02-03T14:18:15","date_gmt":"2022-02-03T14:18:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mailinvest.blog\/index.php\/2022\/02\/03\/new-fcc-broadband-nutrition-label-will-more-clearly-inform-you-youre-being-ripped-off\/"},"modified":"2022-02-03T14:18:15","modified_gmt":"2022-02-03T14:18:15","slug":"new-fcc-broadband-nutrition-label-will-more-clearly-inform-you-youre-being-ripped-off","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mailinvest.blog\/index.php\/2022\/02\/03\/new-fcc-broadband-nutrition-label-will-more-clearly-inform-you-youre-being-ripped-off\/","title":{"rendered":"New FCC Broadband ‘Nutrition Label’ Will More Clearly Inform You You’re Being Ripped Off"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/a>\n<\/p>\n

\n

from the transparently-terrible<\/i> dept<\/h3>\n

\nFor years we’ve noted how broadband providers impose all manner of bullshit fees<\/a> on your bill to drive up the cost of service post sale. They’ve also historically had a hard time being transparent about what kind of broadband connection you’re buying. As was evident back when Comcast thought it would be a good idea to throttle all upstream BitTorrent traffic<\/a> (without telling anybody), or AT&T decided to cap and throttle<\/a> the usage of its “unlimited” wireless users (without telling anybody), or Verizon decided to modify user packets to track its customers around the internet<\/a> (without telling anybody).\n<\/p>\n

\nMaybe you see where I’m going with this.\n<\/p>\n

\nBack in 2016 the FCC eyed the voluntary requirement that broadband providers be required to provide a sort of “nutrition label” for broadband. The idea was that this label would clearly disclose speeds, throttling, limitation, sneaky fees, and all the stuff big predatory ISPs like to bury in their fine print (if they disclose it at all). This was the example image the FCC circulated at the time:\n<\/p>\n

<\/a><\/div>\n

\nWhile the idea was scuttled by the Trump administration, Congress demanded the FCC revisit it as part of the recent infrastructure bill. So the Rosenworcel FCC last week, as instructed by Congress, voted 4-0 to begin exploring new rules:\n<\/p>\n

\n
\n

We\u2019ve got nutrition labels on foods. They make it easy to compare products. It\u2019s time to have the same simple nutrition labels on broadband. Everyone should be able to compare service, price and data. No more hiding fees in fine print.https:\/\/t.co\/Jdc3fj4HgP<\/a>\n<\/p>\n

\n\u2014 Jessica Rosenworcel (@JRosenworcel) January 27, 2022<\/a>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n

\nA final vote on approved rules will come after the Biden FCC finally has<\/a> a voting majority, likely this summer. And unlike the first effort, this time the requirements will be mandatory<\/b>, so ISPs will have to comply.\n<\/p>\n

\nThis is all well intentioned, and to be clear it’s a good<\/b> thing Comcast and AT&T will now need to be more transparent in the ways they’re ripping you off. In fact, when AT&T recently announced<\/a> it would be providing faster 2 and 5 Gbps fiber to some users, it stated it would be getting rid of hidden fees and caps entirely on those tiers. AT&T announced this as if they’d come up with the idea, when in reality they were just getting out ahead of the requirement they knew was looming anyway. So stuff like this does matter.\n<\/p>\n

\nThe problem of course is that forcing ISPs to be transparent about how they’re ripping you off<\/em> doesn’t stop them from ripping you off<\/em>. Big broadband providers are able to nickel-and-dime the hell out of users thanks to two things: regional monopolization causing limited competition, and the state and federal corruption that protects it. U.S. policymakers and lawmakers can’t (and often won’t) tackle that real problem, so instead we get these layers of band aids that only treat the symptom of a broken U.S. telecom market, not the underlying disease.\n<\/p>\n

\n
\"Hide<\/p>\n
\n

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone\u2019s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.<\/p>\n

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites \u2014 especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.<\/p>\n

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying\/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support<\/a>. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise \u2014 and every little bit helps. Thank you.<\/p>\n

\u2013The Techdirt Team<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Filed Under: broadband<\/a>, fcc<\/a>, nutrition labels<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n