{"id":9245,"date":"2022-02-03T05:03:07","date_gmt":"2022-02-03T05:03:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mailinvest.blog\/index.php\/2022\/02\/03\/moar-consolidation-sony-acquires-bungie-but-appears-to-be-more-hands-off-than-microsoft\/"},"modified":"2022-02-03T05:03:07","modified_gmt":"2022-02-03T05:03:07","slug":"moar-consolidation-sony-acquires-bungie-but-appears-to-be-more-hands-off-than-microsoft","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mailinvest.blog\/index.php\/2022\/02\/03\/moar-consolidation-sony-acquires-bungie-but-appears-to-be-more-hands-off-than-microsoft\/","title":{"rendered":"Moar Consolidation: Sony Acquires Bungie, But Appears To Be More Hands Off Than Microsoft"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/a>\n<\/p>\n

\n

from the moar!!!<\/i> dept<\/h3>\n

\nA couple of weeks back we asked the question<\/a>: is the video game industry experiencing an age of hyper-consolidation? The answer to that increasingly looks to be “yes”. That post was built off of a pair of Microsoft acquisitions of Zenimax<\/a> for $7 billion and then a bonkers acquisition of Activision Blizzard King for roughly $69 billion. Whereas consolidations in industries are a somewhat regular thing, what caused my eyes to narrow was all of the confused communications coming out of Microsoft as to how the company would handle these properties when it came to exclusivity on Microsoft platforms. It all went from vague suggestions<\/a> that the status quo would be the path forward to, eventually, the announcement that some (many?) titles would in fact be Microsoft exclusives<\/a>.\n<\/p>\n

\nSo, back to my saying that consolidation does seem to be the order of the day: Sony recently announced it had acquired game studio Bungie for $3.6 billion<\/a>.\n<\/p>\n

\n

\nSony Interactive Entertainment today announced a deal to acquire Bungie for $3.6 billion, the latest in a string of big-ticket consolidation deals in the games industry.<\/em>\n<\/p>\n

\nAfter the deal closes, Bungie will be “an independent subsidiary” of SIE run by a board of directors consisting of current CEO and chairman Pete Parsons and the rest of the studio’s current management team.<\/em>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\nThis is starkly different than the Microsoft acquisitions in a couple of ways. Chief among them is that Bungie will continue to operate with much more independence than those acquired by Microsoft. While Sony obviously wants to recoup its investment in Bungie, the focus there appears to be on continuing to make great games using existing IP, building new IP, and creating content for that IP that expands far beyond just the video game publishing space.\n<\/p>\n

\nWhat does not<\/em> appear to be part of the plan are PlayStation exclusives, as explicitly stated in this interview<\/a> with both Sony Interactive Entertainment CEO Jim Ryan and Bungies’ CEO Pete Parsons.\n<\/p>\n

\n

\nIn an interview with GamesIndustry.biz, Sony Interactive Entertainment CEO Jim Ryan says that Destiny 2 and future Bungie games will continue to be published on other platforms, including rival consoles. The advantages Bungie offers Sony is in its ability to make huge, multiplatform, live-service online games, which is something the wider organisation is eager to learn from.<\/em>\n<\/p>\n

\n“The first thing to say unequivocally is that Bungie will stay an independent, multiplatform studio and publisher. Pete [Parsons, CEO] and I have spoken about many things over recent months, and this was one of the first, and actually easiest and most straightforward, conclusions we reached together. Everybody wants the extremely large Destiny 2 community, whatever platform they’re on, to be able to continue to enjoy their Destiny 2 experiences. And that approach will apply to future Bungie releases. That is unequivocal.”<\/em>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\nThat’s about as firm a stance as you’re going to get in this industry. And it is a welcome sign in a few ways. Primarily, Bungie fans will be pleased to know the acquisition doesn’t mean they’ll lose out on game releases if they don’t own a PlayStation. But perhaps just as important is that this demonstrates another route big gaming companies can go with these acquisitions.\n<\/p>\n

\nAs I stated in previous posts on the Microsoft acquisitions: consolidation doesn’t have <\/em>to be a bad thing, but when it results in less customer choice, that’s not great. That Sony is doing this differently is a good sign.\n<\/p>\n

\n
\"Hide<\/p>\n
\n

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone\u2019s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.<\/p>\n

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites \u2014 especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.<\/p>\n

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying\/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support<\/a>. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise \u2014 and every little bit helps. Thank you.<\/p>\n

\u2013The Techdirt Team<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Filed Under: consolidation<\/a>, video games<\/a>
Companies: bungie studios<\/a>, microsoft<\/a>, sony<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n