{"id":4054,"date":"2022-01-18T23:01:33","date_gmt":"2022-01-18T23:01:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mailinvest.blog\/index.php\/2022\/01\/18\/embattled-activision-blizzard-ceo-bobby-kotick-expected-to-leave-after-microsoft-acquisition\/"},"modified":"2022-01-18T23:01:33","modified_gmt":"2022-01-18T23:01:33","slug":"embattled-activision-blizzard-ceo-bobby-kotick-expected-to-leave-after-microsoft-acquisition","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mailinvest.blog\/index.php\/2022\/01\/18\/embattled-activision-blizzard-ceo-bobby-kotick-expected-to-leave-after-microsoft-acquisition\/","title":{"rendered":"Embattled Activision Blizzard CEO Bobby Kotick expected to leave after Microsoft acquisition"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/a>\n
<\/p>\n

\n

Bobby Kotick, the scandal-ridden CEO of gaming giant Activision Blizzard, may finally step down, reports <\/a>The Wall Street Journal (WSJ).<\/em><\/p>\n

Citing multiple company sources, the WSJ\u00a0<\/em>says Kotick is currently only expected to remain as CEO until Microsoft\u2019s $68.7 billion USD (about $86 billion CAD) acquisition of Activision Blizzard has closed. Microsoft expects this to be completed \u201cin fiscal year 2023,\u201d which means Kotick will likely remain as CEO for up to 18 months. It\u2019s unclear whether other leaders are expected to depart as well.<\/p>\n

Kotick has faced numerous calls to resign following a July 2021 California lawsuit alleging a years-long \u201cfrat boy culture\u201d<\/a> that led to sexual harassment, abuse and unfair hiring practices towards women. Then, in November, a WSJ <\/em><\/a>report alleged that Kotick was not only aware of these issues, but actively worked on keeping them out of the public eye.<\/p>\n

Kotick, meanwhile, has said he\u2019ll only do so if the company\u2019s issues aren\u2019t fixed \u201cwith speed.\u201d<\/a> In a new interview with\u00a0The New York Times\u00a0<\/em><\/a>regarding Microsoft\u2019s acquisition of the company, Kotick also wouldn\u2019t confirm whether he\u2019ll step down after the deal closes, simply saying he\u2019ll be \u201cavailable as needed.\u201d<\/p>\n

Of course, the deal needs to actually be approved by all of the requisite U.S. regulators and lawmakers. While it\u2019s possible it could be blocked, Microsoft (post-Activision Blizzard acquisition) would still only account for less than 15 percent of total gaming revenue behind Sony and Tencent. Therefore, analysts expect that it will likely go through.<\/p>\n

As Xbox boss Phil Spencer noted in a press release, Activision Blizzard will \u201ccontinue to operate independently\u201d from Microsoft until the deal is complete. Once that\u2019s happened, Activision Blizzard will report to him directly.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s worth noting that Spencer had previously said he was \u201cdeeply disturbed\u201d by the allegations surrounding Activision and that Xbox was reevaluating its relationship with the company<\/a> accordingly. Following the news of the acquisition plans, some gamers have pointed out<\/a> that acquiring the company full-stop is an odd way of doing that.<\/p>\n

Bloomberg<\/em>\u2018s <\/a>Jason Schreier also noted on Twitter that he\u2019s heard from some Activision Blizzard employees who simultaneously feel optimistic about change amid Xbox Game Studios\u2019 \u201cpositive culture,\u201d and \u201cfury toward Microsoft for giving Bobby Kotick a big payday and soft exit.\u201d Further, criticism was levied at Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella<\/a>, who said he\u2019s \u201cgrateful to [Kotick\u2019s] leadership and commitment to real culture change.\u201d<\/p>\n

However, given the legalities surrounding a major acquisition like this, it\u2019s unlikely that Microsoft could comment further on the issues. As\u00a0VentureBeat<\/em>\u2018s <\/a>Jeff Grubb pointed out on Twitter, Spencer or other Microsoft executives providing any elaboration could have been seen as \u201cprice manipulation\u201d that would have impacted the deal.<\/p>\n

In a statement posted to Twitter<\/a>, the ABK Workers Alliance, a group made up of employees of Activision, Blizzard and King, said the acquisition news is \u201csurprising\u201d but \u201cdoes not change [its] goals\u201d with regards to improving Activision Blizzard.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe news of Activision\u2019s acquisition by Microsoft is surprising, but does not change the goals of the ABK Worker\u2019s Alliance. We remain committed to fighting for workplace improvements and the rights of our employees regardless of who is financially in control of the company. We will continue to work alongside our allies across the gaming industry to push for measurable change in an industry that desperately needs it. We called for the removal of Bobby Kotick as CEO in November for shielding abusers and he still remains CEO as of this writing. The strike for Raven QA is in its fifth week, and our striking staff has still not received response from leadership regarding our request to negotiate. And finally, 3 out of 4 of our original collective demands to improve the conditions of women in our workforce have not been met. Whatever the leadership structure of the company, we will continue our push to #EndAbuseInGaming<\/a>, and appreciate the outpouring of support we\u2019ve experienced in the last year.<\/em><\/p>\n

The Raven strike, in particular, is referring to dozens of developers at the studio behind\u00a0Call of Duty: Warzone\u00a0<\/em>protesting the sudden termination of 12 quality assurance (QA) contractors<\/a>. QA plays a significant role in ensuring that a game runs sufficiently, and Warzone\u00a0<\/i>has been plagued with bugs amid these layoffs. Multiple QA workers told The Washington Post<\/em><\/a> that they attribute these issues to Raven\u2019s now-reduced QA team. Others said to Inverse<\/a>\u00a0<\/em>that Activision Blizzard has yet to address their concerns.<\/p>\n

Source: Wikipedia<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n