{"id":24764,"date":"2022-12-20T15:53:16","date_gmt":"2022-12-20T15:53:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mailinvest.blog\/index.php\/2022\/12\/20\/nasa-cancels-geocarb-emissions-monitoring-mission\/"},"modified":"2022-12-20T15:53:16","modified_gmt":"2022-12-20T15:53:16","slug":"nasa-cancels-geocarb-emissions-monitoring-mission","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mailinvest.blog\/index.php\/2022\/12\/20\/nasa-cancels-geocarb-emissions-monitoring-mission\/","title":{"rendered":"NASA Cancels GeoCarb Emissions Monitoring Mission"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/a>\n<\/p>\n

\n
This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this page. Terms of use<\/a>.<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n
\n\"\" <\/div>\n<\/div>\n

(Photo: ActionVance\/Unsplash)<\/small><\/center>NASA\u2019s Geostationary Carbon Observatory (GeoCarb) mission would have placed a satellite in geostationary orbit with the sole purpose of tracking Earth\u2019s greenhouse gas emissions. It would have clocked the atmosphere\u2019s carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, and methane levels no less than 10 million times each day. This information would have helped scientists better understand specific regions\u2019 methane emissions as well as how much carbon the Amazon rainforest captures and stores.<\/p>\n

Except now it won\u2019t. After a few weeks of paperwork, NASA has officially canceled the GeoCarb mission as it said<\/a> it likely would in late November. The mission, which was first announced<\/a> in January 2018, will no longer launch this decade as originally planned.<\/p>\n

NASA officials say the University of Oklahoma and Lockheed Martin collaboration would\u2019ve been too resource-intensive to carry out, especially when compared with emissions-monitoring technologies that weren\u2019t available during the mission\u2019s formation. While GeoCarb was estimated to carry a total lifetime cost of $170.9 million back in 2018, that figure is now believed to hover around $600 million, making the project far less financially viable than it was once thought to be. Launching GeoCarb would also reportedly impart a two-year delay on NASA\u2019s Earth System Observatory<\/a>, which is considered a higher priority thanks to its more comprehensive output.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Conceptual GeoCarb mission illustration. (Image: NASA\/Lockheed Martin\/University of Oklahoma)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\u201cDecisions like this are difficult, but NASA is dedicated to making careful choices with the resources provided by the people of the United States,\u201d said Thomas Zurbuchen, associate administrator for science at NASA HQ, in the agency\u2019s November statement. \u201cWe look forward to accomplishing our commitment to state-of-the-art climate observation in a more efficient and cost-effective way.\u201d<\/p>\n

NASA\u2019s newer alternatives include two pieces of equipment that joined the International Space Station (ISS) in 2019 and July 2022, respectively. The first is the Orbiting Carbon Observatory 3 (OCO-3), which uses an array of swiveling mirrors to capture carbon mini-maps<\/a> spanning 1,000 square miles at a time. The other is Earth Surface Mineral Dust Source Investigation (EMIT), an imaging spectrometer that maps the mineral dust composition of Earth\u2019s arid regions to help scientists study how dust affects climate. The Earth System Observatory will also support researchers\u2019 work to better understand climate change, natural disasters, and the holistic effects of modern agriculture.<\/p>\n

NASA hopes to direct the resources that would\u2019ve originally gone to GeoCarb to these programs as it pursues further insight into Earth\u2019s climate. It\u2019ll also direct some funds toward the Earth System Explorers program, which conducts<\/a> space science investigations based on specific targets devised each decade.<\/p>\n

Now Read:<\/b><\/p>\n

<\/span>\n<\/div>\n