{"id":23580,"date":"2022-12-15T01:05:47","date_gmt":"2022-12-15T01:05:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mailinvest.blog\/index.php\/2022\/12\/15\/ibm-to-create-24-core-power-cpu-just-for-oracle-users-the-register\/"},"modified":"2022-12-15T01:05:47","modified_gmt":"2022-12-15T01:05:47","slug":"ibm-to-create-24-core-power-cpu-just-for-oracle-users-the-register","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mailinvest.blog\/index.php\/2022\/12\/15\/ibm-to-create-24-core-power-cpu-just-for-oracle-users-the-register\/","title":{"rendered":"IBM to create 24-core Power CPU just for Oracle users \u2022 The Register"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/a>\n<\/p>\n

\n

IBM has quietly announced it’s planning a 24-core Power 10 processor, seemingly to make one of its servers capable of running Oracle’s database in a cost-effective fashion.<\/p>\n

A hardware announcement<\/a> dated December 13 revealed the chip in the following “statement of general direction” about Big Blue’s Power S1014<\/a> technology-based server:<\/p>\n

The Register<\/em> asked IBM to share details of the planned CPU, and why it feels the need to make one that complies with the SE2 license. The IT giant has not responded, though Oracle’s description<\/a> of the SE2 licensing model goes a long way toward explaining why Big Blue will build a processor for it. Oracle’s blurb states:<\/p>\n

The Power S1014 is a single-socket 4U device, which IBM offers with processor modules boasting four or eight Power10 cores.<\/p>\n

The jump to 24 cores will therefore represent a significant capacity boost for Oracle-on-Power users who opt for a mere single-core server, without requiring them to pay more for Big Red’s database.<\/p>\n

IBM’s decision recalls Lenovo’s 2019 release of the ThinkSystem SR655 server \u2013 a machine which filled its sole CPU socket with a 64-core AMD Epyc 7002. Lenovo promoted the manycore machine as a fine way to run plenty of VMs under VMware’s server virtualization offerings at a time when Virtzilla licensed its wares per socket and few server-grade microprocessors could match the Epyc family’s core count. Buyers liked that idea because a 64-core chip is, on paper, capable of handling more guests than lesser processors.<\/p>\n

VMware did not like that idea as much and quickly changed its licenses<\/a> so that CPUs with over 32 cores counted as an extra socket for licensing purposes.<\/p>\n

The difference in this case is that Oracle’s SE2 license allows for increased core counts without increased charges. VMware’s licenses did not when Lenovo made its Epyc move.<\/p>\n

\n