{"id":18307,"date":"2022-03-03T05:09:10","date_gmt":"2022-03-03T05:09:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mailinvest.blog\/index.php\/2022\/03\/03\/cities-are-turning-to-automation-to-enforce-vehicle-noise-ordinances\/"},"modified":"2022-03-03T05:09:10","modified_gmt":"2022-03-03T05:09:10","slug":"cities-are-turning-to-automation-to-enforce-vehicle-noise-ordinances","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mailinvest.blog\/index.php\/2022\/03\/03\/cities-are-turning-to-automation-to-enforce-vehicle-noise-ordinances\/","title":{"rendered":"Cities Are Turning To Automation To Enforce Vehicle Noise Ordinances"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/a>\n
<\/p>\n

\n

from the not-exactly-the-robocops-we-were-promised\/threatened-with<\/i> dept<\/h3>\n

Automated enforcement may ease the burden on law enforcement agencies and direct more officers towards serious crime, but nearly every device given that job has tended to perform poorly<\/a>. Red light and speed enforcement cameras often get things wrong<\/a> while simultaneously depriving falsely accused drivers of the opportunity to confront their accusers. And, because cities directly benefit from issued tickets, city officials have tinkered with things like yellow light timing<\/a> to increase the number of tickets handed out.<\/p>\n

Another entry in the law enforcement tech field \u2014 ShotSpotter \u2014 uses mics and sensors to detect noises suspected to be gunshots and issues alerts to law enforcement officers. Like the tech listed above, ShotSpotter is sometimes wrong<\/a>. It\u2019s wrongness can actually be quite damaging, since ShotSpotter employees have been accused of overriding decisions<\/a> made by the AI to find gunshots where none existed and, unbelievably, manually moving the location of the detected gunshot to wherever makes the most sense for the narrative being constructed by law enforcement officers.<\/p>\n

The intersection of both forms of tech listed above has come to New York City. As Road & Track reports, the city is utilizing traffic cameras and microphones to ticket drivers for driving too loudly<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\n

If you live in New York and drive a loud car, you could receive a notice from the city\u2019s Department of Environmental Protection telling you your car is too loud. Not because a police officer caught your noisy car, but because a computer did.<\/em><\/p>\n

A photo of an official order from the New York City DEP was published to Facebook by a page called Lowered Congress<\/a> on Monday, directed at a BMW M3 that may have been a bit too loud.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

The notice posted to Facebook<\/a> informs the driver that their vehicle was \u201cidentified\u201d as \u201chaving a muffler that is not in compliance with Section 386\u201d of the city\u2019s traffic laws. Not a single officer was involved in this determination.<\/p>\n

\n

Your vehicle was recorded by a camera that takes a picture of the vehicle and the license plate. In addition, a sound meter records the decibel level as the vehicle approaches and passes the camera.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

The notice then goes on to tell the driver to bring the car to a wastewater treatment plant (?) in Brooklyn to have the vehicle\u2019s exhaust system tested. It also gives the driver a chance to fix the problem before being subjected to any fines. This is better than a regular ticket, which would require a court visit to challenge. And bringing the vehicle in to be tested means the whole thing could go away if it turns out the camera\/mic detection system was wrong.<\/p>\n

That being said, failing to respond to these notices can subject drivers to fines as high as $875 per ignored notice, so no matter how inconvenient it may be to travel to the designated testing site (which, as noted above, appears to be a wastewater facility), ignoring these faux summons appears to be worst of these options.<\/p>\n

Apparently, this ShotSpotter-but-for-cars system has been in place for awhile.<\/p>\n

\n

A New York City DEP spokesman confirmed to Road & Track via email the system is part of a small pilot program that\u2019s been running since September 2021.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

A similar system is about to be put in place<\/a> in Knoxville, Tennessee.<\/p>\n

\n

The City of Knoxville is set to test out a noise-monitoring camera, a device that could help officials enforce local noise restrictions against loud vehicles.<\/em><\/p>\n

The device is similar to red light cameras but is triggered by sound by using a filter designed to pick up on noisy vehicles and exhaust. A camera is scheduled to be installed at the intersection of Gay Street and Clinch Avenue for a trial run at no cost to the city.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

This is the same system currently being test driven in New York City. An earlier interview with the director of the UK company<\/a> providing the tech mentions the company has seven systems in use, including the one in New York City<\/a>. The company also explained how the system works.<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cThe noise camera system is a class 1 precision sound level meter at the heart of it. With a couple of high resolution cameras attached to it. It\u2019s measuring video and audio and noise levels all the time. It\u2019s waiting for a noisy vehicle, and when it detects one, it captures video, audio, noise levels, and uploads everything to a web server, where someone can review it and make a judgment as to whether it\u2019s ok or not,\u201d said Intelligent Instruments director, Dave Coles.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

What the system won\u2019t do is record conversations. According to Coles, people conversing near these systems won\u2019t produce enough decibels or the right frequencies to activate the system. And while the system may be constantly recording, it\u2019s also constantly deleting, maintaining a running buffer until activated by the right kind of noise.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s a limited system that addresses a very specific problem. Unlike ShotSpotter, when this system is wrong, it\u2019s unlikely to result in drivers being accosted by powerful people wielding guns. But it does suggest there\u2019s plenty of marketplace room left for entrants in the traffic surveillance market. All they have to do is find a need cities have yet to realize can possibly be addressed by automation.<\/p>\n

\nFiled Under: ai<\/a>, automated policing<\/a>, noise ordinance<\/a>, nypd<\/a>
\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n