{"id":17617,"date":"2022-03-01T04:46:42","date_gmt":"2022-03-01T04:46:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mailinvest.blog\/index.php\/2022\/03\/01\/fake-text-is-more-convincing-than-fake-speech-footage-the-register\/"},"modified":"2022-03-01T04:46:42","modified_gmt":"2022-03-01T04:46:42","slug":"fake-text-is-more-convincing-than-fake-speech-footage-the-register","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mailinvest.blog\/index.php\/2022\/03\/01\/fake-text-is-more-convincing-than-fake-speech-footage-the-register\/","title":{"rendered":"Fake text is more convincing than fake speech footage \u2022 The Register"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/a>\n<\/p>\n

\n

Netizens are more likely to be duped by misinformation presented in text form compared to video clips created with the help of algorithms, according to a study.<\/p>\n

Fake content generated by machine-learning models is becoming increasingly realistic. Images of people of across different ages, genders, and races look like real photographs<\/a>. Voices can be cloned<\/a> and made manipulated to follow a script. Videos appear<\/a> lifelike with face-swapping or lip-syncing techniques. These so-called deepfakes can make it look as though people have said or done things they haven’t, tricking us into believing falsehoods.<\/p>\n

Experts and pundits feared people would be more easily duped by deepfake videos because they would find the material more believable by seeing it, while text would be easy to identify as fake because the writing would be obviously written by a machine or otherwise made up.<\/p>\n

\n