{"id":16421,"date":"2022-02-24T23:40:16","date_gmt":"2022-02-24T23:40:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mailinvest.blog\/index.php\/2022\/02\/24\/a-guide-to-avoiding-misinformation\/"},"modified":"2022-02-24T23:40:16","modified_gmt":"2022-02-24T23:40:16","slug":"a-guide-to-avoiding-misinformation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mailinvest.blog\/index.php\/2022\/02\/24\/a-guide-to-avoiding-misinformation\/","title":{"rendered":"A guide to avoiding misinformation"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/a>\n<\/p>\n

\n
\n

How do you know what to trust, what not to share and what to report? Here are some basic tools everyone should use when consuming breaking news online.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Do not hit that share button. Social media is built for things to go viral, for users to quickly retweet before they\u2019re even done reading the words they\u2019re amplifying. No matter how devastating, enlightening or enraging a TikTok, tweet or YouTube video is, you must wait before passing it on to your own network. Assume everything is suspect until you confirm its authenticity.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

Story continues below advertisement<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Look at who is sharing the information. If it\u2019s from friends or family members, don\u2019t trust the posts unless they are personally on the ground or a confirmed expert. If it\u2019s a stranger or organization, remember that a verified check mark or being well-known does not make an account trustworthy. There are plenty of political pundits and big-name Internet characters who are posting inaccurate information right now, and it\u2019s on you to approach each post with skepticism.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

If the account posting is not the source of the words or images, investigate where it came from by digging back to find the original Facebook, YouTube or Twitter account that first shared it. If you can\u2019t determine the origin of something, that\u2019s a red flag. Be wary of things such as memes of screenshots, which can be even harder to pin down, or anything that elicits an especially strong emotional reaction. Disinformation can prey on that type of response to spread.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

Story continues below advertisement<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

When screening individual accounts, look at the date it was created, which should be listed in the profile. Be wary of anything extremely new (say, it started in the past few months) or with very few followers. For a website, you can see what year it was started on Google. Search for the name of the site, then click on the three vertical dots next to the URL in the results to see what date it was first indexed by the search engine. Again, avoid anything too new. And don\u2019t skip the basics: Do a Google search for the person or organization\u2019s name.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\n

Make a collection of trusted sources<\/p>\n<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Doing mini background checks on every random Twitter account is extremely time-consuming, especially with new content coming from so many places simultaneously. Instead, trust the professionals. Legitimate mainstream news organizations are <\/b>built to vet these things for you, and often do report on the same videos or photos taken by real people after they\u2019ve confirmed their origin.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Use a dedicated news tool such as Apple News, Google News or Yahoo News, which choose established sources and have some moderation built in. On social media, make or find lists of vetted experts and outlets to follow specifically for news about Ukraine. One of the best ways to consume breaking news on Twitter, for example, is to follow verified reporters from trusted outlets who are on the ground. On Twitter\u2019s mobile app, you can add one of these lists and swipe to the right from your home screen to see it at any time.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

There are thousands of legitimate posts coming out of Ukraine, including real videos of troops and first-person narratives from locals. Even if you see only real posts, it can still be confusing or misleading. Try to augment all these one-off clips or stories with broader context about what is happening. They may be the most compelling pieces of a puzzle, but they are not the whole picture. Mix in information from established experts on foreign policy, cyberwarfare, history and politics, or turn to online or television outlets that do this for most stories.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

If you\u2019re interested in doing deeper dives into things you see, start with this extensive guide <\/a>on how to screen videos. Look for multiple edits and odd cuts, listen closely to the audio and run it through a third-party tool such as InVid, which helps check the authenticity of videos. This can be harder on live-streamed videos, like what\u2019s on Twitch or any other live social media option.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

To check images, put them into Google\u2019s image search by grabbing a screenshot and dragging it to the search field. If it\u2019s an old image that\u2019s circulated before, you may see telling results.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\n

Use fact-checking sites and tools<\/p>\n<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Social media sites do have some of their own fact-checking tools or warning labels. However, given the sheer volume of posts they\u2019re dealing with, a problematic video can be seen by millions before ever getting flagged.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Geoffrey A. Fowler contributed to this report.<\/i><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n