{"id":16189,"date":"2022-02-23T04:49:08","date_gmt":"2022-02-23T04:49:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mailinvest.blog\/index.php\/2022\/02\/23\/video-game-history-foundation-nintendo-actions-actively-destructive-to-video-game-history\/"},"modified":"2022-02-23T04:49:08","modified_gmt":"2022-02-23T04:49:08","slug":"video-game-history-foundation-nintendo-actions-actively-destructive-to-video-game-history","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mailinvest.blog\/index.php\/2022\/02\/23\/video-game-history-foundation-nintendo-actions-actively-destructive-to-video-game-history\/","title":{"rendered":"Video Game History Foundation: Nintendo Actions ‘Actively Destructive To Video Game History’"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/a>\n<\/p>\n

\n

from the ding-ding-ding!<\/i> dept<\/h3>\n

\nI’ve been banging on a bit lately about the importance of video game preservation as a matter of art preservation. It’s not entirely clear to me how much buy in there is out there in general on this concept, but it’s a challenge in this specific industry because much of the control over what can be preserved or not sits in the hands of game publishers and platforms compared with other forms of art. Books have libraries, films have the academies and museums, and music is decently preserved all over the place. But for gaming, even organizations<\/a> like the Video Game History Foundation have to rely on publishers and platforms to let them do their work, or risk art being lost entirely<\/a> to the digital ether or lawsuits over copyright. We’ve talked in the past about how copyright law is far too often used in a way that results in a loss<\/a> of our own cultural history, and digital-only video games are particularly vulnerable to that.\n<\/p>\n

\nWe just discussed Nintendo’s forthcoming shutdown<\/a> of the 3DS and Wii U stores, and what that meant for digital games that Nintendo indicates it is not<\/em> planning on selling anywhere else. Well, the Video Game History Foundation released a statement on that action<\/a> and, well, hoo-boy…\n<\/p>\n

\n

\nWhile it is unfortunate that people won\u2019t be able to purchase digital 3DS or Wii U games anymore, we understand the business reality that went into this decision. What we don\u2019t understand is what path Nintendo expects its fans to take, should they wish to play these games in the future. As a paying member of the Entertainment Software Association, Nintendo actively funds lobbying that prevents even libraries from being able to provide legal access to these games. Not providing commercial access is understandable, but preventing institutional work to preserve these titles on top of that is actively destructive to video game history. We encourage ESA members like Nintendo to rethink their position on this issue and work with existing institutions to find a solution.<\/em>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\nAccusing Nintendo of being “actively destructive to video game history” is a hell of a charge, but point out where it’s wrong. I’ll wait.\n<\/p>\n

\nThe problem here is that video games are still seen, both by the public and producers, as something less than the kind of artistic output of literature, paintings, sculptures, or movies. Imagine a world where someone took the collective works of Monet or Bach, shutdown the venue in which you could pay to see them, and then also indicated that nobody else was allowed to display them for commercial benefit or not. Nobody would accept such a situation. That is culture and it belongs, in at least some small ways, to all of us.\n<\/p>\n

\nEither because the history of video games is much more recent, or due to stodgy hand-waiving about how these games are not “real art”, far less fur is raised over Nintendo taking these actions without any guarantee, or in some cases hostility, to preservation efforts. Yes, Nintendo has directly produced many of these games and it has rights for them due to that. But those games are also part of our shared cultural history, and no individual or company is, or should be, afforded the right to determine how we document that cultural history.\n<\/p>\n

\nIf nothing else, that certainly isn’t the purpose of copyright law.\n<\/p>\n

\n
\"Hide<\/p>\n
\n

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone\u2019s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.<\/p>\n

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites \u2014 especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.<\/p>\n

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying\/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support<\/a>. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise \u2014 and every little bit helps. Thank you.<\/p>\n

\u2013The Techdirt Team<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Filed Under: culture<\/a>, history<\/a>, video games<\/a>
Companies: nintendo<\/a>, video game history foundation<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n