{"id":14946,"date":"2022-02-18T23:18:16","date_gmt":"2022-02-18T23:18:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mailinvest.blog\/index.php\/2022\/02\/18\/battlefield-2042-three-months-later-problems-at-every-level\/"},"modified":"2022-02-18T23:18:16","modified_gmt":"2022-02-18T23:18:16","slug":"battlefield-2042-three-months-later-problems-at-every-level","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mailinvest.blog\/index.php\/2022\/02\/18\/battlefield-2042-three-months-later-problems-at-every-level\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Battlefield 2042\u2019 three months later: Problems at every level"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/a>\n<\/p>\n

\n
\n

\u201cBattlefield 2042,\u201d its developers at Dice and publisher, EA, have been harshly criticized by players for its buggy state and lack of industry standard features since its November 2021 release. Some crucial numbers size up the state of the game. Start with 4,500, which is the number of average players for \u201cBattlefield 2042\u201d over the past 30 days. If that number seems small for one of the most anticipated games of last year, it is. On Feb. 16, the title ranked 223rd on Steam Charts for active players, well behind \u201cCall of Duty: Black Ops 3,\u201d which released in 2015. In fact, over the last 30 days \u201cBattlefield 2042\u201d has had fewer average players than those currently playing 2018\u2032s \u201cBattlefield V\u201d (12,900) or even 2016\u2032s \u201cBattlefield 1\u2033 (5,409).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Another insightful number is 203,872, which is the total number of signatures for a Change.org petition demanding owners of the game on all platforms be permitted refunds.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

This is the backdrop for revisiting the game now, to see what progress had been made since its buggy release in November. Three months on, \u201cBattlefield 2042\u201d has made up little ground, and EA and Dice have veered into the uncomfortable position occupied by CD Projekt Red following its disastrous rollout of \u201cCyberpunk 2077.\u201d Instead of rolling out new game modes, features and content over the past quarter, the priority has been to make sure the game simply works. In fact, that has been such a focal point, Dice announced its \u201cSeason One\u201d content, which was initially expected to drop in March, will not begin until \u201cearly Summer 2022.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

Story continues below advertisement<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Indeed, the main story line around \u201cBattlefield 2042\u201d is one of a cautionary tale, with players hurling justifiable criticism at the game\u2019s bugs, its fundamental design and the decision to release the game in such poor condition. Are things improved in the game since its launch? Yes. There appear to be fewer bugs. An error message no longer populates the top right corner of the title screen every time I load in on PlayStation 5. In playing about 10 hours over the past two weeks, I didn\u2019t once experience the glitch in which downed squadmates that had clipped through a wall or some other object couldn\u2019t be revived.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

But my experience was far from perfect. During the second round of one session, my loadout selection screen turned invisible. Then in the round, all my loadouts reverted to their defaults with none of the attachments I\u2019d selected. Players would freeze mid stride as though they\u2019d been turned into a statue. The missile lock reticle for the anti-air launcher still bugs out and disappears.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Back when I first reviewed the game, I noted that the bugs were only part of the problem. There was also a very foundational issue that the game just wasn\u2019t that fun to play. Three months later, that remains true. Perhaps because of the amount of attention required to patch up the bugs, there haven\u2019t been many changes that substantially improve the enjoyment level.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Perhaps it\u2019s best summarized this way: I don\u2019t think I\u2019ve ever felt more alone playing a multiplayer game. Yes, a large chunk of that feeling stems from the continued lack of in-game voice chat. But other methods of communication feel worthless. It\u2019s rare that any of my squadmates respond to a request made using the ping wheel. And the text chat inevitably and predictably devolves into one player raging at their teammates to \u201cgit gud,\u201d while another eggs them on and the diplomatic efforts of a third fail after reminding everyone that \u201cguys, it\u2019s just a game.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

Story continues below advertisement<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

In a way, I\u2019m grateful for those exchanges. At least I know there are other living souls on the server with me. Whenever I try to load into a PlayStation-only lobby, the excessive wait times to fill the server make me wonder if anyone else out there on the PlayStation Network is still playing this game.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

What\u2019s more, it\u2019s impossible to meet and connect with a consistent group of squadmates in \u201cBattlefield 2042.\u201d There\u2019s no easy way to talk to them. And if I can\u2019t talk with them, what possible reason do I have to send someone a friend request or try to squad up with them? I have no way of knowing anything about them. They could be a toxic moron. Knowing nothing about them, why would I add them to my PlayStation Party or Discord?<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

And this contributes to the biggest problem \u201cBattlefield 2042\u201d faces. There are things worse than bugs and player outrage, and that\u2019s player apathy. My gaming friends (most of whom I met over game chat) and I will gripe about aspects of \u201cCall of Duty: Warzone\u201d incessantly. From the cheaters, to poor sound cues, we rail on the state of the game with startling frequency. But we still get on and play regularly because we enjoy each other\u2019s company and we can all play \u201cWarzone.\u201d Playing \u201cBattlefield 2042\u201d right now is not a communal experience. And when the game was crafted for and marketed to Battlefield\u2019s extremely devoted community, that\u2019s a big issue.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

Story continues below advertisement<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Henderson\u2019s article recounting the town hall noted that \u201c’Battlefield 2042\u2032s\u2019 bug count ratio got to \u2018historic levels for a Dice game,'” and that EA and Dice were aware but felt they fell within acceptable margins based on previous Dice releases. The belief was that the studio, which had capably righted the ship after rocky launches of previous titles, could do the work on the fly.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

In a statement to The Washington Post addressing reports of the town hall, EA Vice President of Communication, John Reseburg, characterized it as \u201can in-depth and very humble internal conversation about the recent Battlefield launch. It was about key learnings and actions we are taking, not blaming external factors.\u201d It is good that EA and Dice are assessing what went wrong around \u201cBattlefield 2042\u201d and that developers are working to improve it. But hopefully no one loses sight of the biggest problem of all. The initial decision to patch up a flawed game after release \u2014 particularly over the holiday season when developers traditionally take a needed respite \u2014 shows zero respect for consumers. \u201cSell it, then fix it\u201d is a recipe for disaster for any product, and that\u2019s exactly what was cooked up with \u201cBattlefield 2042.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

Story continues below advertisement<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Ironically, in Henderson\u2019s report on the town hall, another game came up during the discussion: \u201cHalo Infinite,\u201d which impressed players with its amount of polish<\/a> when it released shortly after the \u201cBattlefield 2042\u201d launch. The irony there is that \u201cHalo Infinite\u201d was delayed by a year after fans griped about the game\u2019s appearance. The decision, which at the time deprived the Xbox Series X of a top-tier, exclusive launch title, appears to have been a good one for Microsoft and 343 Industries, the game\u2019s publisher and developer.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

You only get one chance to make a first impression. It\u2019s cliche, but that\u2019s because it\u2019s true. \u201cBattlefield 2042\u2032s\u201d first impression was not a good one. In fact, our initial review headline directly stated that the game \u201cshould have been delayed.\u201d<\/a> Per Steam Charts, it debuted to a peak audience of over 100,000 players. Three months later, there are fewer than 5,000 playing on average. With \u201cSeason One\u201d not starting until \u201cearly summer,\u201d I can\u2019t help but wonder how many players will stick around to see if \u201cBattlefield 2042\u201d is worthy of a second chance.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n