{"id":14888,"date":"2022-02-18T20:32:43","date_gmt":"2022-02-18T20:32:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mailinvest.blog\/index.php\/2022\/02\/18\/thankfully-jay-inslees-unconstitutional-bill-to-criminalize-political-speech-dies-in-the-washington-senate\/"},"modified":"2022-02-18T20:32:43","modified_gmt":"2022-02-18T20:32:43","slug":"thankfully-jay-inslees-unconstitutional-bill-to-criminalize-political-speech-dies-in-the-washington-senate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mailinvest.blog\/index.php\/2022\/02\/18\/thankfully-jay-inslees-unconstitutional-bill-to-criminalize-political-speech-dies-in-the-washington-senate\/","title":{"rendered":"Thankfully, Jay Inslee’s Unconstitutional Bill To Criminalize Political Speech Dies In The Washington Senate"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/a>\n<\/p>\n

\n

from the don’t-criminalize-free-speech<\/i> dept<\/h3>\n

\nOver the last few years, it’s been depressing to see politicians from both major political parties attacking free speech. As we noted last month, Washington state governor Jay Inslee last month started pushing a bill that would criminalize political speech<\/a>. He kept insisting that it was okay under the 1st Amendment because he got a heavily biased constitutional lawyer, Larry Tribe, to basically shrug and say “maybe it could be constitutional?” But the bill was clearly problematic — and would lead to nonstop nonsense lawsuits against political candidates.\n<\/p>\n

\nThankfully, cooler heads have prevailed in the Washington Senate and the bill has died<\/a>. The bill’s main sponsor is still insisting that it would survive 1st Amendment scrutiny, but also recognized that it just didn’t have enough political support:\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\nState Sen. David Frockt (D), who sponsored the bill, said, “We have to respect that the bill in its current form did not have enough support to advance despite the care we took in its drafting through our consultation with leading First Amendment scholars.”\n<\/p>\n

<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\nInslee, for his part, still insists something must be done:\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\nAfter the bill was defeated on Tuesday, Inslee said in a statement, “We all still have a responsibility to act against this Big Lie … we must continue to explore ways to fight the dangerous deceptions politicians are still promoting about our elections.”\n<\/p>\n

<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\nAnd, look, I don’t disagree that the Big Lie about the 2020 election is a problem<\/em>. But you don’t solve problems by censoring 1st Amendment protected speech. That never ends well. At all.\n<\/p>\n

\n
\"Hide<\/p>\n
\n

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone\u2019s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.<\/p>\n

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites \u2014 especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.<\/p>\n

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying\/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support<\/a>. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise \u2014 and every little bit helps. Thank you.<\/p>\n

\u2013The Techdirt Team<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Filed Under: 1st amendment<\/a>, election misinformation<\/a>, free speech<\/a>, jay inslee<\/a>, lies<\/a>, misinformation<\/a>, political speech<\/a>, washington<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n