{"id":123818,"date":"2026-04-22T14:40:09","date_gmt":"2026-04-22T14:40:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mailinvest.blog\/index.php\/2026\/04\/22\/nasa-reckons-artemis-ii-heat-shield-performed-like-a-champ-the-register\/"},"modified":"2026-04-22T14:41:05","modified_gmt":"2026-04-22T14:41:05","slug":"nasa-reckons-artemis-ii-heat-shield-performed-like-a-champ-the-register","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mailinvest.blog\/index.php\/2026\/04\/22\/nasa-reckons-artemis-ii-heat-shield-performed-like-a-champ-the-register\/","title":{"rendered":"NASA reckons Artemis II heat shield performed like a champ \u2022 The Register"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/a>\n<\/p>\n

\n

Preliminary studies have confirmed NASA’s evaluation that the Orion warmth defend stored the Artemis II crew protected throughout re-entry.<\/p>\n

\"SLS\"\/<\/p>\n

Clock is ticking for NASA to repair bucket of points earlier than subsequent Artemis mission<\/h2>\n

FROM THE ARCHIVES<\/span><\/a><\/div>\n

The defend had been hotly debated earlier than the mission’s April 1 launch. When the Orion capsule used for Artemis I returned to Earth in 2022, engineers discovered sudden cracks and charring (see under), prompting a delay to Artemis II whereas a repair was developed.<\/p>\n

\"Artemis<\/a><\/p>\n

Above:<\/strong> Artemis II warmth defend photographed by Navy divers shortly after splashdown (Pic: US Navy<\/em>)
\n
Under:<\/strong> Submit-mission Orion heatshield from Artemis I mission (Picture: NASA<\/em>)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\"Post_mission_Orion_heat_shield\"<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

After in depth testing, NASA concluded the issues needed to do with gasoline inside the coating, brought on by the re-entry method utilized by Artemis I. The maneuver concerned the capsule dipping into the ambiance to wash off velocity, then skipping off (very like a pebble on water) earlier than performing a closing re-entry. The advantage of the method is larger precision and diminished heating, however at the price of trapped gases degrading the defend.<\/p>\n

Somewhat than redesign the warmth defend, NASA chose<\/a> to alter the reentry trajectory and drop the skip fully. That choice attracted some criticism. Former astronaut Charles Camarda, who flew on the STS-114 House Shuttle Return To Flight mission, called<\/a> the plan to fly Artemis II with the heatshield “a really dangerous resolution.”<\/p>\n

Nonetheless, according<\/a> to NASA, once they examined the top defend after Artemis II splashed down on April 10, it was evident issues had gone in accordance with the refined plan. The company wrote that “preliminary inspections of the system discovered it carried out as anticipated, with no uncommon situations recognized.<\/p>\n

“Diver imagery of the spacecraft’s warmth defend initially taken after splashdown and additional inspections on the restoration ship discovered the char loss habits noticed on Artemis I used to be considerably diminished, each by way of amount and dimension. Efficiency additionally was in line with arc jet facility floor testing carried out after Artemis I.”<\/p>\n

\n