{"id":11964,"date":"2022-02-10T20:52:15","date_gmt":"2022-02-10T20:52:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mailinvest.blog\/index.php\/2022\/02\/10\/elon-musk-update-on-starship-nasa-return-to-the-moon\/"},"modified":"2022-02-10T20:52:15","modified_gmt":"2022-02-10T20:52:15","slug":"elon-musk-update-on-starship-nasa-return-to-the-moon","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mailinvest.blog\/index.php\/2022\/02\/10\/elon-musk-update-on-starship-nasa-return-to-the-moon\/","title":{"rendered":"Elon Musk update on Starship, NASA return to the moon"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/a>\n<\/p>\n

\n
\n

Now, with Musk scheduled to give an update Thursday at 9 p.m. Eastern time on the rocket system at SpaceX\u2019s facility at the southernmost tip of Texas near the Gulf of Mexico, the landscape has changed dramatically. SpaceX has a production line that is pumping out Starship test vehicles one after the other. Several have flown several miles high. And while some of those crash landed<\/a> in debris-strewing fireballs, SpaceX finally stuck a landing last spring<\/a>, achieving a milestone that it says will allow it to refly the vehicles over and over, as it does its other rocket, the Falcon 9<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

Story continues below advertisement<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Perhaps most significantly, NASA awarded SpaceX a nearly $3 billion contract<\/a> last spring to use the spacecraft to land its astronauts on the moon as part of its Artemis program. It was a major stamp of approval that survived legal challenges<\/a> thrown up by one of the losing bidders, Jeff Bezos\u2019s Blue Origin. (Bezos owns The Washington Post.)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

During the presentation, Musk is expected to give a timeline of when Starship will be ready for an orbital launch attempt as well as whether it is on track to meet NASA\u2019s goal of getting astronauts to the lunar surface by 2025.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

As he told The Post in an interview last year, \u201cThe overarching goal of Starship is to be able to transport enough tonnage to the moon and to Mars to have a self-sustaining base on the moon, and ultimately a self-sustaining city on Mars.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

Story continues below advertisement<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

SpaceX\u2019s Texas facility, dubbed \u201cStarbase,\u201d has been utterly transformed in the past few years. It is an impressive sight.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

On Thursday, a Starship spacecraft stood stacked on top of a Super Heavy booster, a nearly 400-foot-tall tower of stainless steel gleaming in the winter sun. The first-stage booster has an astonishing 29 Raptor engines and is designed to deliver Starship to orbit and then fly back to its launchpad and be caught by a pair of metal arms that look like giant chopsticks, which is, as Musk told The Post, \u201cpretty nuts.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The promise of the system has galvanized Musk\u2019s obsessive fan base, who at times flock to SpaceX\u2019s facility here, which sits next to a public road.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

Story continues below advertisement<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

But there are many significant hurdles ahead, and Musk has a tendency to be overly optimistic about the timeline<\/a> for his ambitious projects. And when he feels his teams aren\u2019t rising to meet his demanding timelines, he\u2019ll let them know. In November, for example, he reportedly wrote an email <\/a>to SpaceX employees complaining about the slow rate of progress in the development of its next-generation Raptor engine. \u201cThe Raptor production crisis is much worse than it seemed a few weeks ago,\u201d he wrote. And he said the company faced a \u201cgenuine risk of bankruptcy if we cannot achieve a Starship flight rate of at least once every two weeks next year.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

That dire prediction was probably overblown, analysts have said, a way for Musk, a notoriously hard charger, to motivate his teams. But flying anything of Starship\u2019s size is going to be a daunting challenge, and SpaceX faces additional layers of complexity: Starship will need to be refueled in orbit several times by tanker ships before making its way to the moon, and SpaceX still doesn\u2019t have a license to launch its gleaming spacecraft.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The Federal Aviation Administration<\/a> has yet to complete an environmental review of the launch site necessary before it can grant a license. The FAA originally planned to complete the review by the end of last year. But it\u2019s received more than 18,000 comments from the public, a massive influx from both supporters who believe in Musk\u2019s vision that Starship will allow humanity to reach the moon and Mars, and from detractors who fear it will ruin a fragile ecosystem along a fragile coastline.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

Story continues below advertisement<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The new deadline for completing the review is Feb. 28, and it may be delayed even further.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

In a letter to the FAA, the Interior Department wrote that it has \u201cremaining concerns\u201d that the use of Starbase to launch Starship could adversely affect air quality, climate change and force the closure of wildlife preserves.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\u201cBoca Chica is an important link of the Lower Rio Grande Valley \u2018Wildlife Corridor,\u2019 \u201d according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service\u2019s website<\/a>. \u201cIt connects habitat along the Gulf Coast to the Rio Grande and allows wildlife to travel unimpeded.\u201d The agency notes that the Kemp\u2019s Ridley sea turtle, \u201cthe most critically endangered sea turtle in the world, comes ashore to nest on refuge beaches in the spring and summer.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

Story continues below advertisement<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Many local officials, however, remain supportive since SpaceX is bringing jobs to a border area struggling with poverty and unemployment.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

While the FAA conducts its review, NASA is charging ahead with its Artemis campaign to return astronauts to the moon. While Starship would ferry the astronauts to and from the lunar surface, the crew would be launched in an Orion capsule perched on top of the space agency\u2019s Space Launch System rocket. Like Starship, it is massive and has never flown to space before. Unlike Starship, it\u2019s expendable \u2014 the core stage of the SLS will fall into the ocean after launch, never to be used again.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The program has suffered all sorts of setbacks and delays. But NASA is planning to roll the rocket, with the Orion stacked on top of it<\/a>, to the launchpad at the Kennedy Space Center in Florida next month so that it could be fueled and technicians can simulate a countdown. It will then be rolled back into its assembly building for further tests<\/a>. NASA hopes to launch it for the first time this spring. That mission would send the Orion capsule, without any astronauts on board, in orbit around the moon.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

Story continues below advertisement<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Astronauts would be on board the next launch, Artemis II, and would orbit the moon again, but not touch down. On the Artemis III mission, Starship would dock with Orion near the moon, and then ferry the astronauts to the surface <\/a>before returning them to Orion, which would carry them back to Earth.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Starship also has some key tests coming up, pending the FAA\u2019s approval. If the orbital launch attempt goes well, SpaceX intends to start flying it frequently. And it also intends an uncrewed test landing on the moon before landing astronauts there.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n