{"id":114071,"date":"2026-02-09T21:39:31","date_gmt":"2026-02-09T21:39:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mailinvest.blog\/index.php\/2026\/02\/09\/ai-chatbots-rank-the-top-super-bowl-ads-and-leave-out-big-tech\/"},"modified":"2026-02-09T21:41:10","modified_gmt":"2026-02-09T21:41:10","slug":"ai-chatbots-rank-the-top-super-bowl-ads-and-leave-out-big-tech","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mailinvest.blog\/index.php\/2026\/02\/09\/ai-chatbots-rank-the-top-super-bowl-ads-and-leave-out-big-tech\/","title":{"rendered":"AI Chatbots Rank the Top Super Bowl Ads\u2014and Leave Out Big Tech"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/a>\n<\/p>\n

\n

Tremendous Bowl 60 introduced the biggest tech players<\/a>\u2014some making their debut, like Anthropic<\/a>\u2014into the highlight to pitch AI instruments. But, not a single main AI<\/a> firm appeared within the prime 20 most cited adverts throughout AI chatbots.<\/p>\n

Evaluation from Emberos\u2019 AI Affect Index of ChatGPT<\/a>, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and Grok exhibits that Xfinity, Bud Light<\/a>, Squarespace, Ramp, Dove, and Volkswagen dominated the responses, revealing an surprising hierarchy formed by how every AI system interprets readability, function, and cultural resonance.<\/p>\n

\"\"
Emberos<\/cite><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

\u201cThere\u2019s a very wholesome combine between CPG, tech, alcohol, and auto manufacturers,\u201d stated Justin Inman, founder and CEO of Emberos. \u201cYou’d assume that Anthropic or OpenAI can be within the prime 20, particularly for AI affect\u2014and so they\u2019re not.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u200b\u200bSimilar immediate, completely different reminiscence<\/strong><\/h4>\n

To grasp how AI programs shaped these rankings, Emberos examined how the 5 chatbots responded to an identical post-Tremendous Bowl questions, together with \u201cWhat have been one of the best Tremendous Bowl adverts?\u201d The agency discovered that 40% to 55% of an identical prompts produced meaningfully completely different framing throughout giant language fashions.<\/p>\n

These variations turned particularly clear when Emberos examined how the fashions responded to the query, \u201cWhich Tremendous Bowl advert stood out probably the most and why?\u201d<\/p>\n

ChatGPT framed Dove\u2019s advert as a values-driven model second, emphasizing confidence, inclusivity, and emotional resonance, and specializing in how the message bolstered long-term model fairness.<\/p>\n

Anthropic\u2019s Claude interpreted the identical advert via an authenticity and intent lens, highlighting moral alignment and sincerity of function, with much less emphasis on virality and extra on human affect. Grok, owned by xAI, framed Dove primarily via cultural response, pointing to on-line discourse and blended sentiment round purpose-driven promoting, emphasizing debate and skepticism reasonably than the message itself.<\/p>\n

Throughout the board, Emberos discovered that AI recall was removed from uniform. Rankings diverse by 20% to 30% relying on whether or not a mannequin prioritized informational readability, emotional resonance, or cultural relevance.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

The highest tier of adverts remained comparatively constant throughout platforms, however the center of the pack proved risky. Ramp, for instance, was ranked No. 3 in Claude, No. 5 in ChatGPT, and dropped to No. 11 in Gemini. Dove adopted an analogous sample, inserting No. 2 in Claude, No. 7 in ChatGPT, and No. 13 in Gemini.<\/p>\n

In a panorama more and more formed by LLMs, advert memorability seems to be decided much less by spend and extra by how simply a marketing campaign will be summarized, cited, and reinterpreted by machines.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\"The<\/a> <\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n

The place\u2013and why\u2013LLMs disagree\u00a0<\/strong><\/h4>\n

The evaluation highlights why AI fashions keep in mind the Tremendous Bowl in a different way.\u00a0<\/p>\n

ChatGPT, for instance, favored adverts that might be defined clearly in dialog, producing balanced, narrative-driven responses. Claude prioritized emotional resonance and function, elevating campaigns that emphasised values or storytelling.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Perplexity leaned on data and citations, giving weight to adverts with robust press protection or extensively shared recaps. Gemini targeted on mainstream visibility and tech relevance, rewarding campaigns with broad consciousness or media presence.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Grok, in the meantime, was attuned to tradition and sentiment, amplifying adverts that sparked humor, controversy, or social response.<\/p>\n

LLMs favor challenger manufacturers<\/strong><\/h4>\n

A number of challenger manufacturers punched above their weight in AI recall, per Emberos.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Ramp, which ranked No. 4 general, benefited from the readability of its B2B messaging, which made it simple for fashions to summarize and cite. It additionally appeared ceaselessly in enterprise and tech recaps, boosting its rating in Claude and ChatGPT past what public reputation polls advised.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Make investments America, at No. 11, equally over-indexed: Its finance-focused adverts lent themselves to structured, informational narratives, giving them constant visibility throughout prompts.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Even ai.com, at No. 18, earned a lift because of what Emberos calls \u201cAI key phrase gravity,\u201d with fashions favoring its AI-adjacent branding\u2014notably in Gemini\u2014whereas different platforms saved it mid-tier.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Emberos\u2019 AI Affect Index means that a number of challenger manufacturers loved greater AI visibility than \u201cgeneral-popularity expectations, probably as a result of their messaging was unusually simple for LLMs to summarize, cite, and re-contextualize in follow-on prompts.\u201d<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\"Crypto.com<\/a> <\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n