{"id":11128,"date":"2022-02-08T20:38:14","date_gmt":"2022-02-08T20:38:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mailinvest.blog\/index.php\/2022\/02\/08\/uk-government-refreshes-its-terrible-online-safety-bill-adds-even-more-content-for-platforms-to-police\/"},"modified":"2022-02-08T20:38:14","modified_gmt":"2022-02-08T20:38:14","slug":"uk-government-refreshes-its-terrible-online-safety-bill-adds-even-more-content-for-platforms-to-police","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mailinvest.blog\/index.php\/2022\/02\/08\/uk-government-refreshes-its-terrible-online-safety-bill-adds-even-more-content-for-platforms-to-police\/","title":{"rendered":"UK Government Refreshes Its Terrible ‘Online Safety Bill,’ Adds Even More Content For Platforms To Police"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/a>\n<\/p>\n

\n

from the maybe-the-gov’t-could-just-print-out-a-shorter-list-of-speech-it-likes<\/i> dept<\/h3>\n

\nThe UK’s internet censorship bill rebranded from “Online Harms” to “Online Safety” last spring<\/a>. The name change did nothing to limit the breadth of the bill, despite supposedly shifting the focus from “harm” to “safety.” Whatever the name, it’s still being touted by supporters as a fix for anything anyone doesn’t like about the internet.\n<\/p>\n

\nSpeech will be policed. Lots of it. Everyone from megalithic Meta to the person running a niche message board will be subject to the new rules, which shifts liability from the posters of unwanted or illegal content to the third parties hosting it.\n<\/p>\n

\nIn order to find and remove content found on the ever-lengthening list of “bad” content (which, let’s highlight again, includes legal<\/em> content<\/a>), platforms and services will have to perform more internal policing of content. This means that, in many cases, encryption for content and communications will no longer be a viable option. To comply with the law — one that carries potential fines of up to 10% of a company’s global revenues — providers will have to remove end-to-end encryption so they can monitor communications between users.\n<\/p>\n

\nThe UK government isn’t honest enough to call for the end of encryption. But it’s willing to let attrition<\/a> do its dirty work for it. The anti-encryption agitating continues<\/a>, despite the UK government’s Information Commissioner’s Office telling the rest of the government that weakening or eliminating encryption will harm more children than it saves<\/a>.\n<\/p>\n

\nThe bill marches forward, gathering even more speech-harming detritus. As CNBC reports, another round of UK government inquiries has resulted in the proposed law being made even worse<\/a>.\n<\/p>\n

\n

\nThe government said Friday that the bill will now include extra-priority provisions outlawing content that features revenge porn, drug and weapons dealing, suicide promotion and people smuggling, among other offences.<\/em>\n<\/p>\n

\nIt will also target individuals who send online abuse and threats, with criminal sentences ranging up to five years.<\/em>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\nStuff that was already on the ban list has been given greater priority, aligning self-harm and drug dealing with the big baddies of “terroristic content” and child sexual abuse material. Online threats and “abuse” will get stiffer legal penalties.\n<\/p>\n

\nBut that’s not all: there’s more to add to the UK government’s list of content it would like to treat as criminal acts.\n<\/p>\n

\n

\nThe government said it is considering further recommendations, including specific offences such as sending unsolicited sexual images and trolling epilepsy sufferers, tackling paid-for scam advertising, and bringing forward criminal liability for senior company executives at the tech firms.<\/em>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\nEvery addition adds to the list of content that platforms and services must proactively monitor and remove. The addition of criminal liability for tech execs may seem like a crowd pleasing Guillotine 2.0, but in reality, it just means jailing people because their companies failed to achieve the impossible tasks the UK government has asked of them.\n<\/p>\n

\nA lot of what’s being added won’t be easily detected by AI or human moderators — certainly not proactively. Context matters but proactive monitoring means context will be ignored. The difference between revenge porn and regular porn isn’t immediately and obviously clear. Pictures of guns or drugs are not necessarily promotional. And there are going to be some people in desperate need of help getting caught in the friction between talking about suicide and “suicide promotion.”\n<\/p>\n

\nIt all sounds good when it’s still on paper and reads like a blueprint for a trouble-free online existence. But it falls apart the moment you start asking questions about how this can be implemented without massively altering the contours of free speech in the UK and generating an incredible amount of collateral damage that may, in many cases, negatively affect the same vulnerable people the government believes this bill will protect.\n<\/p>\n

\n
\"Hide<\/p>\n
\n

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone\u2019s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.<\/p>\n

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites \u2014 especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.<\/p>\n

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying\/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support<\/a>. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise \u2014 and every little bit helps. Thank you.<\/p>\n

\u2013The Techdirt Team<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Filed Under: censorship<\/a>, encryption<\/a>, free speech<\/a>, liability<\/a>, online safety bill<\/a>, takedowns<\/a>, uk<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n