{"id":110226,"date":"2026-01-12T23:15:49","date_gmt":"2026-01-12T23:15:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mailinvest.blog\/index.php\/2026\/01\/12\/amds-fsr-redstone-frame-generation-tested-image-quality-gets-a-boost-but-theres-one-deal-breaking-catch\/"},"modified":"2026-01-12T23:17:25","modified_gmt":"2026-01-12T23:17:25","slug":"amds-fsr-redstone-frame-generation-tested-image-quality-gets-a-boost-but-theres-one-deal-breaking-catch","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mailinvest.blog\/index.php\/2026\/01\/12\/amds-fsr-redstone-frame-generation-tested-image-quality-gets-a-boost-but-theres-one-deal-breaking-catch\/","title":{"rendered":"AMD\u2019s FSR Redstone Frame Generation tested: image quality gets a boost, but there\u2019s one deal-breaking catch"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/a>\n<\/p>\n

\n

Nvidia<\/a> and AMD<\/a> have gone head-to-head once more with DLSS 4.5 and FSR Redstone, respectively, and to this point, I’ve examined the latter, particularly analyzing its body technology replace, and I can merely say that I am impressed.<\/p>\n

FSR 4 upscaling has already made big developments in comparison with FSR 3.1. I covered this a long while ago<\/a> and highlighted that its super-resolution picture high quality was nice, even surpassing Nvidia’s DLSS 3 (which was extra related at the moment), however nonetheless trailed behind DLSS 4.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n