Hewlett Packard Enterprise has come out swinging two months after a $30 million verdict towards it in a long-running case, saying claims by Oracle it straight infringed copyrights within the Solaris OS are usually not backed by sufficient proof.

In a movement filed on July 29 [PDF], HPE alleged the proof supplied by Oracle to show it supplied prospects with software program updates for the proprietary Unix working system (initially developed by Sun Microsystems) with out Large Pink’s permission didn’t “assist a discovering that any purportedly put in patch is copyrighted.”

HPE is saying Oracle didn’t show any of the patches and updates in query “are lined by legitimate registrations,” which means they would not be protected by copyright. It claimed this “warrants judgment on all of Oracle’s copyright claims.” Failing this, HPE mentioned it ought to be given a brand new trial.

It mentioned within the submitting:

It additionally went on to say that Oracle could not show HPE had the correct or means to manage software program assist supplier Terix’s “purported infringement” to justify a declare for vicarious infringement. Terix is a managed IT providers supplier alleged to have supplied unlicensed Oracle assist by getting Solaris patches from Oracle’s buyer assist web site and utilizing them to service their very own assist prospects.

Again in June, following a three-week trial, a jury discovered that HPE ought to pay Oracle $30 million for copyright infringement after a jury discovered it responsible of offering prospects with Solaris software program updates beneath a plan devised by Terix.

The jury, whose verdict was unanimous, additionally discovered [PDF] that HPE vicariously infringed Oracle’s copyrights in addition to deliberately interfering with Oracle’s prospects.

Terix, for its half, was sued by Oracle in 2013, with Large Pink saying the agency had violated copyright by offering “allegedly improper installations of Solaris patches onto servers not lined beneath a assist contract.” The software support slinger settled that case in 2015 for almost $58 million.

The July 29 submitting is the newest salvo within the 2016 copyright infringement case Oracle introduced towards HPE associated to the patches provided to Solaris prospects.

Additionally on Friday, Oracle filed a movement [PDF] asking the courtroom for a everlasting injunction towards “any copying, distribution, or use of Oracle’s Solaris software program, firmware or assist supplies, whether or not by HPE or any others beneath HPE’s supervision and management, besides as allowed by Oracle.”

We have requested Oracle and HPE for remark. ®

Source link