whistleblowerFrances Haugen revealed her id on “60 Minutes” this Sunday.
- Haugen secretly copied 1000’s of pages of inner paperwork she says present Fb prioritizing “revenue over security.”
- Watch this 13-minute interview clip to listen to some of the clearly articulated arguments towards Fb.
The Fb whistleblower who leaked tens of 1000’s of pages of inner firm analysis revealed her id on “60 Minutes” this Sunday, and clearly walked viewers via what she sees as the primary downside with Fb and the actions of its management.
Her title is Frances Haugen, and she or he’s a 37-year-old knowledge scientist who previously labored on Fb’s civic integrity group combatting misinformation, a bunch that was dissolved after the 2020 Presidential election.
Earlier than Fb, Haugen labored at Pinterest and Google – she has a level in laptop engineering and an MBA from Harvard.
“I’ve seen a bunch of social networks and it was considerably worse at Fb than something I might seen earlier than,” she instructed “60 Minutes” host Scott Pelley on Sunday.
Haugen secretly copied tens of 1000’s of pages of Fb’s inner firm analysis which was then revealed in The Wall Road Journal’s Fb Recordsdata collection.
On this 13-minute clip, she explains precisely how and why Fb amplifies divisive content material, a observe she says creates “conflicts of curiosity between what was good for the general public and what was good for Fb – and Fb over and over selected to optimize for its personal pursuits, like making extra money.”
Haugen stated the primary motive Fb’s misinformation downside continues to persist is because of algorithmic adjustments the social community made in 2018.
“You would possibly see solely 100 items of content material in case you sit and scroll on for, you understand, 5 minutes,” Haugen defined. “However Fb has 1000’s of choices it may present you.”
She stated Fb optimizes content material most definitely to encourage engagement, one other time period for consumer reactions.
“Misinformation, indignant content material, is engaging to folks and retains them on the platform,” she instructed “60 Minutes.”
“One of many penalties of how Fb is selecting out that content material right this moment, is that it is optimizing for content material that will get engagement, a response, however its personal analysis is exhibiting that content material that’s hateful, that’s divisive, that’s polarizing, it is simpler to encourage folks to anger than it’s to different feelings,” she stated. “Fb has realized that if they alter the algorithm to be safer, folks will spend much less time on the location, they’re going to click on on much less advertisements, they’re going to make much less cash.”
“Day-after-day our groups need to stability defending the suitable of billions of individuals to precise themselves overtly with the necessity to make our platform a secure and optimistic place,” Fb instructed “60 Minutes” in an announcement. “We proceed to make important enhancements to deal with the unfold of misinformation and dangerous content material. To recommend we encourage dangerous content material and do nothing is simply not true.”
Along with breaking down Fb’s
Later within the interview, she revealed how Fb pressured main political events throughout Europe to take “excessive coverage positions,” how
Haugen’s full interview will be considered on “60 Minutes OverTime.”